Our kaupapa is about people, their communities, their futures. It is no surprise therefore that we are critically aware of the central role played by local government in terms of the range of policies and decisions that affect the people of Aotearoa. And we welcome the return of the 4 wellbeings to guide and underpin such decision-making. But LG funding is the elephant on the room.
Nothing is certain … except death and taxes. Once thing that is uncertain, is how our taxes will look in the future. The Tax Working Group (TWG) has released its interim report last week, making certain that the taxes will continue, though there may be some changes in the pipeline.
On the 10th July 2018 Statistics New Zealand announced that the first population and household count outputs of the 2018 Census would be delayed from October 2018 to March 2019, with a corresponding delay in the output of all other 2018 Census data releases. This was unsurprising, given that Statistics New Zealand only closed off collection of Census data in May 2018, and the consequent announcement on 1 June 2018 that there was only a 90 percent response rate.
With the 2018 Budget set to be delivered on Thursday 17 May, 2018, one of the hot topics is the amount of additional debt the current Labour-New Zealand Coalition Government will take on to fund its new initiatives, investments and programmes over the coming year.
If the prospect of increasing wages is sufficient to throw global stock markets into a tailspin (as they did last week), then there is something endemically wrong with the economic mechanism. This is further evidence of my statement last year that the neo-liberal economic model has failed us.
General Elections are supposed to be won or lost because the economy has performed well or badly (hence the “it’s the economy, stupid” remark, often wrongly attributed to former US President Clinton).
New Zealand is one of the countries in the OECD with the lowest levels of government debts, when expressed as percentage of GDP.
BERL stands by its assessment of Labour Party Fiscal Plan costings
Put simply, the country faces the prospect of much larger numbers of old people living longer, and the question of how they can continue to be supported financially demands to be addressed.
One of the most contentious and enduring issues in the political arena is health expenditure, and whether it has increased sufficiently.
As we suggested earlier in the month, the Budget has bent over backwards to signal that all is well with the economy and, consequently, the government’s books. Further, the initiatives and new programs do their best to indicate there are new measures to tackle the pressing issues of the day.
Tax Management NZ (TMNZ) is working with New Zealand charities to ensure a portion of the near- $232 million in unclaimed donation rebates can go back to charity.
This year’s Budget has all the hallmarks of one ‘treading water’. There will be strenuous efforts expended to make it look like something is being done; but, without the will to wish to do anything. With the accounts showing a borderline surplus (or deficit), the chances of any significant tax relief will remain on the backburner.
Please click on the following link to the article ‘There is a plan – Budget 2015’
This note is to state for the record that BERL strongly affirms the robustness of the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) calculations provided in 2011 to the Labour Party.
This month’s fiscal accounts are a story of unexpected revenue, and rosy gains and losses forecasts.
Modest, targeted spending increases sit behind Budget 2013. The Minister of Finance, Hon Bill English, indicated that the Government will return to surplus by 2014/15. Hailed as a budget that was building momentum, Budget 2013 indicates a slow and cautious approach whereby no money will be set aside for capital spending over this and the following three Budgets, and any new capital spending will come from the existing balance sheet.
Treasury lowered its forecast 2014-15 surplus to $66 million (on the Total Crown OBEGAL measure), but is still holding out for a surplus.
As we expected, the risks identified in the Treasury’s July Monthly Economic Indicators squeezed the positives according to the Government’s just released annual accounts for 2011/12. Initially, the latest annual government accounts looked like some positive reading: Core Crown revenue was up 5 percent, and expenses down by 2 percent on their 2011 levels. But in dollar terms, as revenue was only $60.6 billion while expenses were $69.1 billion, the Government ran a deficit.
Treasury’s latest Monthly Economic Indicators conclude that the “domestic economy is looking in relatively good shape”, while acknowledging that “the global outlook worsened further in July, with downside risks increasing”. It sees “a pick up in coming quarters” that will see inflation accelerate and spare capacity be absorbed (by growth).
The latest fiscal accounts (for the 11 months to May 2012) have some positives in them, and continue a recent trend of applying discipline (but not austerity) to the government accounts. The following table and figures summarise the actual and forecast Core Crown accounts.
First, returning the government’s books to surplus by 2014/15 despite an increasing austere global environment is achieved through a forecast surplus of $197 million in that year. This is $1.1 billion lower than last year’s Budget forecast for that year. Thereafter, the fiscal surplus is set to grow further to reach $2.1 billion in 2015/16.
Treasury has released the final set of fiscal accounts before the release of the Budget in about a fortnight. The media release, however, is slightly misleading, as it does not always clearly distinguish when it is referring to Core Crown versus Total Crown figures. So while the government deficit is still bad, the actual figures are perhaps not as bad as one might interpret from a scan of Treasury’s media release.
Treasury regularly publishes data on the monthly tax take – the tax “outturn” data. These publications are usually released about six weeks after the end of the month. It is some of the earliest data available on how the economy is tracking. The data are reported for both “receipts” (cash that has been received by the collecting agency) and “revenue” (tax that is due, but which may not have actually been paid yet). The latter is an accrual measure, and is the most useful for gauging activity.
The latest financial statements for Treasury for the seven months to January 2012 show a big hole in the fiscal accounts.